Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection 3.101(10) regarding the kind of deer that may be taken, a person with unused kill tags valid for both an antlered and antlerless deer for the deer management unit in which they are hunting, and killing a male antlerless deer, may tag the male antlerless deer with a kill tag designated in subsection 3.101(10) for the taking of an antlered deer.
rule · row 41 of the record
The document
mi_wco.pdf · identification: sha_verified
Michigan Natural Resources Commission, The Wildlife Conservation Order (Michigan Department of Natural Resources), pp.18-35 (Chapter III, sections 3.100-3.124, deer), pp.136-152 (Chapter XII, sections 12.1-12.499, deer management units) and p.167 (Chapter XII, sections 12.900-12.999, CWD management zone and Pure Michigan hunt unit). No source URL is recorded: see `scope`.
url divergence: record cites '', sidecar records None. The bytes are the ones the record attests to (sha256 matches exactly); the citation url and the fetch url differ.
bytes hash to the record's source_sha256; the .pdf.source sidecar names a different url
located: a verbatim source line of this row appears on page 27 of the source PDF and on no other page the record read
This row, on page 27
6 source line(s) occur exactly once on page 27; the box is that occurrence
3.101f permitted tagging of male antlerless deer.
history: am. 6, 2001, eff. jun 1, 2001; am. 8, 2003, eff. jun 7, 2003.
sec. 3.101f notwithstanding the provisions of subsection 3.101(10) regarding the kind of deer that may
be taken, a person with unused kill tags valid for both an antlered and antlerless deer for the deer
management unit in which they are hunting, and killing a male antlerless deer, may tag the male
antlerless deer with a kill tag designated in subsection 3.101(10) for the taking of an antlered deer.
Page 27 of mi_wco.pdf
The page is the document's, unedited. What this compilation read off it is the row above; what it did not read is on the state page under “what this record does not carry”.
